Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac:42568 comp.sys.mac.hardware:448 Path: utzoo!yunexus!ists!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!zebra.cvs.rochester.edu!carlo From: carlo@zebra.cvs.rochester.edu (Carlo Tiana) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.hardware Subject: Re: FaxModem Recommendations ? Summary: sends only Keywords: Fax, Faxmodem Message-ID: <4132@ur-cc.UUCP> Date: 18 Nov 89 17:32:12 GMT Article-I.D.: ur-cc.4132 References: <6291@tank.uchicago.edu> <1989Nov16.235034.27718@hellgate.utah.edu> Sender: news@uhura.cc.rochester.edu Reply-To: carlo@cvs.rochester.edu (Carlo Tiana) Organization: Univ. Roch. Center for Visual Sci. Lines: 31 In article <1989Nov16.235034.27718@hellgate.utah.edu> t-jacobs@cs.utah.edu (Tony Jacobs) writes: >The most recent MacWeek - 14th November - page 14 has an ad by Prometheus >on their ProModem Data/Fax modem for $299. > >The picture show a modem hooked up to a Murata M1200 which printing out >an incomming fax. I also saw that - so I called them up and asked what I thought was rather a stupid question i.e. "can it RECEIVE fax?". The ad does not mention reception anywhere. The answer was "No, Sir, send only." Beats me why they would do this. I am still debating whether I want to have something that can send only. After all, if you fax something somewhere, they may want to fax back a reply. On the otehr hand, yes they do bundle MacKnowledge and BackFax, the latter having received rather favorable comments in MacUser, August (I think). Each can be bought for about $120.-, so the whole deal may be even worth it anyway; Prometheus' 2400bps modem sells for about $199.- anyway, and for $100.- extra you get fax-sending and some software (potentially useful if you do buy a receive-also fax card soon). Does anyone have this 1/2fax-modem and care to comment on it? Does anyone have other fax-modems and care to give us their impressions, what they wish they had, what they don't care for much? Carlo. carlo@cvs.rochester.edu "Oh shit, not /dev/null!!!"