Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!rutgers!ucsd!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!lll-winken!ames!zodiac!cinnamon!charleen
From: charleen@cinnamon.ADS.COM (Charleen Bunjiovianna)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: vi editor enhancement request
Keywords: vi display emacs
Message-ID: <9800@zodiac.ADS.COM>
Date: 16 Nov 89 02:33:16 GMT
References: <456@tron.UUCP> <5530@ethz-inf.UUCP> <20668@unix.cis.pitt.edu>
Sender: news@zodiac.ADS.COM
Reply-To: charleen@ads.com (Charleen Bunjiovianna)
Organization: Estrogen-Crazed Lust Bunnies
Lines: 24

I can't take this any more.  Is this guy for real?

In article <20668@unix.cis.pitt.edu> yahoo@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Kenneth L Moore) writes:
>In article <5530@ethz-inf.UUCP> wyle@ethz.UUCP (Mitchell Wyle) writes:
>>In article <456@tron.UUCP> wali@tron.UUCP (Saleem Wali) writes:
>==>==> (vi editor) Is there anyone who knows of a utility which 
>==>==> allows "vi" to
>==>==>**   Westinghouse Electric Corp.   *    New on the job      
>==>
>==>-Mitch (vi fanatic) Wyle
>
>You two might want to think about switching to emacs. 
>[...]
>The big deal though is that emacs is "universal".  

Like hell it is.  Not only are there significant differences in
commands from version to version, but some sites don't even have
emacs installed because they can't afford the overhead.

Charleen


I put some instant coffee in a microwave and almost went back in time.
                                 -- Steven Wright