Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!samsung!usc!rutgers!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: SYS V SIGCLD Handling
Message-ID: <11667@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 22 Nov 89 21:55:13 GMT
References: <957@sdrc.UUCP> <11656@smoke.BRL.MIL> <870@omen.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 7

In article <870@omen.UUCP> caf@omen.UUCP (Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX) writes:
-In article <11656@smoke.BRL.MIL> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn) writes:
-:I think the whole notion of signals is broken, but there's not
-:much point in getting into that..
-OK, what should replace the notion of signals??

There are lots of possibilities; e.g. CSP.