Xref: utzoo news.groups:14896 news.admin:7724
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cica!iuvax!cogsci!dave
From: dave@cogsci.indiana.edu (David Chalmers)
Newsgroups: news.groups,news.admin
Subject: Re: STV new group proposal
Message-ID: <30171@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>
Date: 22 Nov 89 03:20:14 GMT
References: <2438@stl.stc.co.uk> <2440@stl.stc.co.uk> <29992@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <1989Nov21.144817.14808@ntvax.uucp>
Sender: root@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu
Reply-To: dave@cogsci.indiana.edu (David Chalmers)
Organization: Indiana University, Bloomington
Lines: 19

In article <1989Nov21.144817.14808@ntvax.uucp> jbeard@ntvax.UUCP (Jeff Beardsley) writes:

>I think it should more properly be:
>
>1:	Yes/No/Abstain on the charter
>2:	STV on name
>
>This allows people who dont care whether a group exists or not, to vote
>against a particular name, without lending support to another name, or
>to the charter in particular.

Absolutely.  This is what I intended, I'm sorry if I didn't make it 
explicit enough.  Furthermore, there should also be an option to abstain
from the name vote if all one cares about is the existence of the group.

--
Dave Chalmers     (dave@cogsci.indiana.edu)      
Concepts and Cognition, Indiana University.
"To live outside the law you must be honest..."