Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!usc!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!art100
From: ART100@PSUVM.BITNET (Andy Tefft)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Call for discussion -- comp.binaries.usenet-ps-maps
Message-ID: <89323.004034ART100@PSUVM.BITNET>
Date: 19 Nov 89 05:40:34 GMT
References: <8911081800.AA06383@prune.bbn.com>
 <1989Nov13.191057.6656@talos.uucp> <2406@stl.stc.co.uk>
Organization: Penn State University
Lines: 13

In article <2406@stl.stc.co.uk>, dww@stl.stc.co.uk (David Wright) says:
>
>In article <1989Nov13.191057.6656@talos.uucp> kjones@talos.uu.net writes:
>#The name IS pretty cumbersome., but not because of the "-ps-".  Since we
>#already have comp.mail.maps, what's wrong with comp.mail.ps-maps?
>
>Basically what's wrong with it is that the maps are about news flow, not
>mail routing, so comp.mail doesn't really fit.
>
>What's wrong with news.lists.maps?   (Or even put them in the existing
>news.lists along with the full Arbitron results).

I don't understand how the 'lists' applies to a Usenet map...?