Xref: utzoo news.admin:7658 news.groups:14729
Path: utzoo!yunexus!ists!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ficc!jeffd
From: jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell)
Newsgroups: news.admin,news.groups
Subject: Three-part voting
Message-ID: <7033@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 17 Nov 89 15:48:12 GMT
Article-I.D.: ficc.7033
Organization: Ferranti International Controls
Lines: 24


Karen Valentino is correct.  A three-part ballot is in order.
One part on whether to create a group for a particular topic;
one part to decide the hierarchy; one part to pick a name.
If the first part does not result in 100 more YESes than
NOs (hopefully that requirement will be eased if such a plan
is adopted), then there's no need to tabulate parts 2 and 3.


Jeff Daiell

Elise, are you still out there?







-- 
         "I'm just a soul whose intentions are good ...
        Oh, Lord,  please don't let me be misunderstood!"

                              -- The Animals