Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!iuvax!watmath!looking!brad
From: brad@looking.on.ca (Brad Templeton)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: You want one that fits in 25 lines?
Message-ID: <49809@looking.on.ca>
Date: 19 Nov 89 07:45:17 GMT
References: <45326@looking.on.ca> <41800006@inmet> <46614@looking.on.ca> <2420@stl.stc.co.uk>
Reply-To: brad@looking.on.ca (Brad Templeton)
Organization: Looking Glass Software Ltd.
Lines: 13
Class: discussion

Actually, I thought I was clear that the trial name (and if I have my
way the final name) are not chosen at all by the person who proposes
the group, but instead by an independent person who volunteers to come
up with good names.

As I have said before, the most important attribute of a name hierarchy
is that it be consistent.  It's more important that it be consistent
than "correct," whatever that means.

Having group champs propose a name, or having people vote on a selection
of names will never be consistent.
-- 
Brad Templeton, ClariNet Communications Corp. -- Waterloo, Ontario 519/884-7473