Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!milano!bigtex!pmafire!geoff
From: geoff@pmafire.UUCP (Geoff Allen)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Proposed Guidelines Change (was Re: A Few Observations)
Message-ID: <866@pmafire.UUCP>
Date: 20 Nov 89 15:04:45 GMT
References: <1989Nov10.045531.4549@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu> <36393@apple.Apple.COM> <1626@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> <2562D3D9.16489@ateng.com> <5289@ncar.ucar.edu> <5806@unix.SRI.COM> <864@pmafire.UUCP>
Reply-To: geoff@pmafire.UUCP (Geoff Allen)
Organization: WINCO Computer Engineering, INEL, Idaho
Lines: 18

In article <864@pmafire.UUCP> I wrote:
>[Acutally, I'm a little surprised at the lack of response to my article.
> Everyone was screaming `We need facts!  Where's the data?!'  Then I
> post some data and am greeted with silence.  What gives?  (I did get an
> e-mail response from Richard Shapiro, so I assume the article got out to
> y'all.) ]

Well, I got a pretty good e-mail response to this comment.  The general
consensus seems to be that the facts pretty well spoke for themselves,
and there was little need for comment. 

I guess I'd have gotten more response if I'd nominated Richard for
President! :-)

-- 
Geoff Allen                  \  Driggs, Idaho -- cultural hub of the west!
{uunet|bigtex}!pmafire!geoff  \
ucdavis!egg-id!pmafire!geoff   \  (Tom Harper in rec.skiing)