Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!iuvax!watmath!xenitec!edhew
From: edhew@xenitec.on.ca (Ed Hew)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Renewed call f/ discussion : ALT.KIDS
Message-ID: <1989Nov24.065456.24925@xenitec.on.ca>
Date: 24 Nov 89 06:54:56 GMT
References: <1989Nov17.032939.11435@ddsw1.MCS.COM>
Reply-To: edhew@xenitec.UUCP (Ed Hew)
Followup-To: news.groups
Distribution: news
Organization: XeniTec Consulting Services, Kitchener, ON, Canada
Lines: 18

In article <1989Nov17.032939.11435@ddsw1.MCS.COM> benfeen@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Ben Feen) writes:
>Ok, here's an idea;  How do you guys feel about alt.kids, rather than
>soc.kids, and the more suggestive rec.kids?
>	That way, as I understand it, sites could take it or leave it.
>	(Somebody fill me in on the exact difference between alt groups and
>	rec., misc, and biz., etc. groups!)

I think that's an excellent idea.  It's the old "let's try it without
having to annoy easily annoyed people" method and will give the concept
a chance to sink or swim (please, no fishy jokes) on it's own merits.

I wouldn't have to "vote" on it, simply propogate it (at least what of
alt comes here to the boonies hanging directly off a major backbone).

  Ed. A. Hew       Authorized Technical Trainer        Xeni/Con Corporation
  work:  edhew@xenicon.uucp	 -or-	 ..!{uunet!}utai!lsuc!xenicon!edhew
->home:	 edhew@xenitec.on.ca	 -or-	   ..!{uunet!}watmath!xenitec!edhew
  # This posting has absolutely nothing to do with what I do for a living.