Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!rpi!tale
From: tale@pawl.rpi.edu (David C Lawrence)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: ***Call for discussion:  Rec.video.software***
Message-ID: <256F1CA8.2EB@rpi.edu>
Date: 25 Nov 89 23:13:43 GMT
References: <17100@umn-cs.CS.UMN.EDU> <1632@shuksan.UUCP>
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Lines: 18

In <1632@shuksan.UUCP> scott@shuksan.UUCP (Scott Moody) writes:
Scott> The 'n' key works great.

Statements like this are made far too frequently to cover anything
from high traffic in a group to posting test messages to non-test
groups.  It is not a valid argument for people who don't want to see
the articles to begin with.  There might be _other_ valid arguments,
but this one simply doesn't cut it.

Perhaps we should merge comp.all into just one group, "comp".  After
all, if you don't want to read the articles about everyone else's
system or language, your 'n' key works, right?

Dave

By the way, I don't like the "software" part of the name, either.
-- 
 (setq mail '("tale@pawl.rpi.edu" "tale@ai.mit.edu" "tale@rpitsmts.bitnet"))