Xref: utzoo news.groups:15063 news.admin:7801 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rice!brazos.rice.edu!bbc From: bbc@nysa.rice.edu (Benjamin Chase) Newsgroups: news.groups,news.admin Subject: Re: STV new group proposal -- worked example (LONG) Message-ID: Date: 26 Nov 89 07:04:57 GMT References: <2438@stl.stc.co.uk> <2440@stl.stc.co.uk> Sender: root@rice.edu Reply-To: Benjamin Chase Followup-To: news.groups Organization: CPRC, Rice University Lines: 11 In-reply-to: dww@stl.stc.co.uk's message of 19 Nov 89 23:29:09 GMT In article <2440@stl.stc.co.uk> dww@stl.stc.co.uk (David Wright) writes: >Stage 5: the NO vote is transferred! The NO vote should not ever be transferred. The people voting no don't have any other choices, and yet must be heard. If the NO category is on the bottom of the heap, choose the second least popular candidate, and redistribute those votes. -- Ben Chase , Rice University, Houston, Texas (First one up against the wall when the fish police arrived.)