Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!shelby!apple!usc!samsung!uunet!bfmny0!tneff From: tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff) Newsgroups: alt.sources.d Subject: Re: promoting Perl (was Re: uutraffic report (in perl)) Message-ID: <14961@bfmny0.UU.NET> Date: 28 Nov 89 18:18:13 GMT References: <4025@mhres.mh.nl> <1194@radius.UUCP> <3273@convex.UUCP> <5261@omepd.UUCP> <1126@cirrusl.UUCP> <1989Nov28.064349.1421@eda.com> Reply-To: tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff) Lines: 20 In article <1989Nov28.064349.1421@eda.com> jim@eda.com (Jim Budler) writes: >I can't actually disagree with you, however, perl won me over with >ONE simple example: > > % find -exec < most any command> \; >versus > % find -print | perl -ne 'equiv_command;' > >The performance improvement was HUGE! My goodness. It's a darn good thing the above quoted poster never read the man page for xargs(1). He might have been won over by UNIX! :-) -- Canada -- a few acres of snow. ^v^v^ Tom Neff -- Voltaire v^v^v tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com