Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!excelan!unix!hplabs!hp-pcd!hp-sdd!ncr-sd!ncrcae!hubcap!dawill From: dawill@hubcap.clemson.edu (david williams) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: GaAs considered dead , indium phosphide, rod logic? Summary: Nanotech Message-ID: <7269@hubcap.clemson.edu> Date: 30 Nov 89 21:21:49 GMT References: <24317@cup.portal.com> <480@dmk3b1.UUCP> <1376@argus.UUCP> Organization: Clemson University, Clemson, SC Lines: 30 In article <1376@argus.UUCP>, ken@argus.UUCP (Kenneth Ng) writes: > In article <1Tcfjq#9jMTbv=eric@snark.uu.net>, eric@snark.uu.net (Eric S. Raymond) writes: > : If you're the gambling type, bet your bux on ballistic-transistor technology > : or indium phosphide or even nanotechnology rod logic. But forget GaAs. It is > > Hm, indium phosphide I once heard that mentioned by Cray (yes that > Cray), but I never heard of nanotechnology rod logic. Is it real > or is it a joke of some kind? Does anyone know of anyone working > with indium phosphide at least? As much as any nanotechnology is "real", nanotech rod logic is real. Look at it this way: Rather than having various electrical signals, the nanotech stuff works mechanically, since they are so small that electrical stuff just overwhelms it. Suppose our logic worked by having little bitty rods that get shuttled back and forth: for example, an and gate would have a rod that would be pushed to the on state when both input rods were pushing on it. An OR gate would be really simple: input 1 --- | | ----- output input 2 --- | If either input rod gets pushed on, it would push the bridge and thereby push the output rod. You can play all sorts of mind games building this sort of logic. Considering how *small* this stuff is, it should be able to react really fast. Building it would be tough, though. Dave Williams dawill@hubcap.clemson.edu (signature macro on other computer) Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com