Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!nuchat!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: NEC V80 Message-ID: <7186@ficc.uu.net> Date: 1 Dec 89 20:25:23 GMT References: <2966@taux01.UUCP> <28388@necntc.nec.com> Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 17 In article <28388@necntc.nec.com> pec@necntc.nec.com (Paul Cohen) writes: > > And the question foremost in everyone's mind... is it an 80386 clone? > > -- Chuq Von Rospach, chuq@Apple.COM That sounds like a question I asked. I'll have to be more careful with my cute little .signature quotes... because some people are not at all careful about attributions. > No! Not at all! It is NEC's own architecture. Pity. I'd have liked to pull the replace-the-x86-with-a-NEC-chip trick again. -- `-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. . 'U` Also or . "The basic notion underlying USENET is the flame." -- Chuq Von Rospach, chuq@Apple.COM Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com