Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:8777 comp.databases:4278
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!watmath!xenitec!edhew
From: edhew@xenitec.on.ca (Ed Hew)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.databases
Subject: Re: Foxbase 2.0 performance
Keywords: foxbase, performance
Message-ID: <1989Nov29.044550.5342@xenitec.on.ca>
Date: 29 Nov 89 04:45:50 GMT
References: <2763@munnari.oz.au> <9210@spool.cs.wisc.edu>
Reply-To: edhew@xenitec.UUCP (Ed Hew)
Followup-To: comp.unix.xenix
Organization: XeniTec Consulting Services, Kitchener, ON, Canada
Lines: 17

In article <9210@spool.cs.wisc.edu> thurm@shorty.cs.wisc.edu (Matthew Thurmaier) writes:
>FoxBASE+ 2.10 Performance is FAR greater than foxbase 1.04, provided you
>are running compiled.  It still has some bugs though.

SCO now has (as of about 2 months ago) fox+ 2.1.1a available.  It's
a minor upgrade for registered 2.1.0 owners.  We carry it in stock
(at work), so I would assume that most SCO 3rd level resellers would
have it.  You do have to provide the serial number, in return for
which you get some useful buggy-fixes.

>Matthew J. Thurmaier                ...decvax!garp!harvard!uwvax!thurm
>The Computer Classroom              matt@shorty.cs.wisc.edu

  Ed. A. Hew       Authorized Technical Trainer        Xeni/Con Corporation
  work:  edhew@xenicon.uucp	 -or-	 ..!{uunet!}utai!lsuc!xenicon!edhew
->home:	 edhew@xenitec.on.ca	 -or-	   ..!{uunet!}watmath!xenitec!edhew
    # Justice is only relative to what you can afford to prove in court.


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com