Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!ncar!umigw!umiami!slores From: SLORES@umiami.miami.edu (Stanislaw L. Olejniczak) Newsgroups: comp.databases Subject: Re: Foxbase 2.0 bug fixes Message-ID: <3833@umiami.miami.edu> Date: 29 Nov 89 20:54:48 GMT References: <2763@munnari.oz.au> <9210@spool.cs.wisc.edu> <1989Nov29.044550.5342@xenitec.on.ca> Followup-To: comp.unix.xenix Organization: Univ. of Miami (IR) Lines: 17 In article <1989Nov29.044550.5342@xenitec.on.ca>, edhew@xenitec.on.ca (Ed Hew) writes: > In article <9210@spool.cs.wisc.edu> thurm@shorty.cs.wisc.edu (Matthew Thurmaier) writes: >>FoxBASE+ 2.10 Performance is FAR greater than foxbase 1.04, provided you >>are running compiled. It still has some bugs though. > > SCO now has (as of about 2 months ago) fox+ 2.1.1a available. It's > a minor upgrade for registered 2.1.0 owners. You do have to provide > the serial number, in return for which you get some useful buggy-fixes. Could you please specify the major bugs fixed? Thanks. ---- Stan Olejniczak Internet: slores@umiami.miami.edu University of Miami, FL USA UUCP: (temp void) gould!umbio!solejni SLORES@UMIAMI.BITNET UUCP: (?) umigw!gables!slores Voice: (305) 547-6571 FAX: (305) 548-4612 My opinions cannot possibly represent the views of anyone else! Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com