Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!ucbvax!mtxinu!sybase!phobos!forrest
From: forrest@phobos.sybase.com (Jon Forrest)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: Intelligent Databases (was Re: DB Procedures)
Message-ID: <7337@sybase.sybase.com>
Date: 4 Dec 89 06:01:57 GMT
References: <4198@rtech.rtech.com> <7323@sybase.sybase.com> <4220@rtech.rtech.com>
Sender: news@sybase.sybase.com
Reply-To: forrest@sybase.com
Organization: Sybase, Inc.
Lines: 21

In article <4220@rtech.rtech.com> davek@rtech.UUCP (Dave Kellogg) writes:
>3. Single Server
>
>	Single multithreaded server which has exclusive control over a set of 
>	databases. 
>	Example:  Sybase
>
>	Strength:  Reduced per-user overhead
>	Weakness:  No multiprocessor support
		   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Does this mean that if we come out with a multiprocessor server that
we'll be perfect?

----
Anything you read here is my opinion and in no way represents Sybase, Inc.

Jon Forrest WB6EDM
forrest@sybase.com
{pacbell,sun,{uunet,ucbvax}!mtxinu}!sybase!forrest
415-596-3422


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com