Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!rutgers!texbell!chinacat!telecom-gateway From: goldstein@delni.enet.dec.com Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Calls With Area Code Prefixes Message-ID: Date: 27 Nov 89 16:59:42 GMT Sender: news@chinacat.Lonestar.ORG Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation, Littleton MA USA Lines: 56 Approved: telecom-request@chinacat.lonestar.org X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 533, message 6 of 10 In article , dgc@math.ucla.edu writes... >Can anyone tell me exactly how calls with area code prefixes are >handled? Previous messages on the handling of 700 calls left me with >some questions unanswered. I think that there are basically 4 cases: >1. 1-800 prefix Two answers on 800 service. Today, they use the "NXX" method. Each of the NXX codes (i.e., 800-221, 800-222, etc.) belongs to one or another LD carrier. The local telco simply hands it off. Each RBOC owns a few of its own, too, for intra-LATA use. "Tomorrow" (R.S.N.), there may be a huge telco-owned collective data base indicating which carrier carries each 800 number. So you will be able to switch carriers without changing 800 numbers. The problem is delay: There's a finite time it takes the telco to send the lookup request through the SS7 network to the data base engine (SCP). It delays call processing by a few seconds. Other than that, the technique works well. >2. 1-900 prefix Like 800 service today, each 900 prefix is handed off to an LD carrier. I don't think there are plans to change it. Note that the caller's default carrier is not meaningful for these SACs, since they're destination-selected. The list of who owns which was posted in this Digest a couple years back. Note that these are not area codes but service access codes. >3. 1-700 prefix This means "carrier specific number", so it's handed off to the default or selected carrier. Each carrier has its own 700 number space to do with as they see fit. >4. All other prefixes If it's intra-LATA, the telco just routes it. If it's inter-LATA, it goes to the default or (10xxx) selected carrier, who figures out what to do with it. >Why couldn't US Telecom just have you dial 11+local number if 1+ calls >(other than 10+ calls) all go to it? Is there some requirement that >exactly 10 digits follow the initial 1? and couldn't that be handled by >having the customer dial dummy 1's either at the beginning (say 1111) or >at the end of the number (111) at the end? The RBOCs are under no obligation to provide "equal access" for intra-LATA calls; that's their own bailiwick. If they did provide it, they'd have to do it equally, like for inter-LATA calls. The numbering plan only has room for so many hacks. It does involve digit counting, etc. fred