Path: utzoo!censor!becker!bdb From: bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce Becker) Newsgroups: comp.graphics Subject: Re: fractals as bad science Message-ID: <1247@becker.UUCP> Date: 3 Dec 89 17:31:58 GMT References: <119.256E54C5@uscacm.UUCP> Reply-To: bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce Becker) Organization: G. T. S., Toronto, Ontario Lines: 20 In article <119.256E54C5@uscacm.UUCP> Jim.McNamee@p7.f12.n376.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Jim McNamee) writes: | | Mark T Vandewettering writes: | |"Fractal geometry may be able to generate images which are convincing images |of nature (and even this I might contest) but this in no way indicates anything |about the mechanism that generates such phenomena." | | In the strictest sense, that's true. But it should be pointed out that the | same criticism must be leveled against Euclidean geometry. Only man and a | few uninteresting natural phenomena rely on that branch of mathematics to | create the world you see. Excellent point, can be easily generalized ... -- ^^ Bruce Becker Toronto, Ont. w \**/ Internet: bdb@becker.UUCP, bruce@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu `/v/-e BitNet: BECKER@HUMBER.BITNET _/ >_ Ceci n'est pas une | - Rene Macwrite Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com