Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cheops.cis.ohio-state.edu!karl From: karl@cheops.cis.ohio-state.edu (Karl Kleinpaste) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc Subject: So this is what X.400 does for me... Message-ID: Date: 4 Dec 89 21:11:34 GMT Sender: news@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Organization: Ohio State Computer Science Lines: 37 Anybody want to comment on this? Anybody want to wonder why a whole lot of people truly fear the advent of X.400? Do the words "weak implementation" occur to anyone else? This is the result of an attempt this morning to send mail to maffeis@ethz.arcom.ch. I just love that Original_Date: field... I sent this just this morning, really I did... |From postmaster@kwai.inria.fr Mon Dec 4 11:50:30 1989 |Received: from mirsa.inria.fr by cheops.cis.ohio-state.edu (5.61/4.891204) | id AA02901; Mon, 4 Dec 89 11:50:30 -0500 |Received: from kwai.inria.fr by mirsa.inria.fr with SMTP | (5.59++/IDA-1.2.8) id AA12169; Mon, 4 Dec 89 17:51:18 +0100 |Message-Id: <8912041651.AA12169@mirsa.inria.fr> |Date: 01 jan 01 00:00:00 |From: Postmaster@kwai.inria.fr |To: karl@cis.ohio-state.edu | |Delivery_Report: |Original_Trace: |Original_Date: 01 jan 01 00:00:00 |Report-Id: Problems gett... |/C=CH/ADMD=ARCOM/PRMD=ethz/S=maffeis/(maffeis@ethz.arcom.ch): |Transfer failure. MTA congestion. | |Returned Content: |================= |From: Karl Kleinpaste |Message-ID: <8912041616.AA02358@cheops.cis.ohio-state.edu> |To: |Subject: Problems getting new GNU releases | |[deleted] --Karl