Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!unhd!jwn770
From: jwn770@uunet!unhd (Jason W Nyberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: How about Sliced EHB ??
Message-ID: <1989Dec4.015245.22702@uunet!unhd>
Date: 4 Dec 89 01:52:45 GMT
References: <568@h.cs.wvu.wvnet.edu> <8912030118.AA15320@en.ecn.purdue.edu>
Reply-To: jwn770@unhd.UUCP (Jason W Nyberg)
Organization: Computing Information Services, University of New Hampshire
Lines: 21

In article <8912030118.AA15320@en.ecn.purdue.edu> bevis@EE.ECN.PURDUE.EDU (Jeff Bevis) writes:
>In article <568@h.cs.wvu.wvnet.edu>, dbl@a.cs.wvu.wvnet.edu writes:
>>    Ok, heres an idea (and I hope no one has been posting this to death)
>>how about a sliced Extra Halfbrite display?  If sliced ham can be done
>
>Is it just me, or is anyone else out there getting disturbed by all of the
>dynamic/sliced/diced/minced display modes involving cpu-intesive activity,
>just to bring up the image?  I mean, what are things migrating toward here?
>SHAM is not a friendly or very practical thing to be working with (in paint
>programs, or for that matter, for anything on this *multitasking* machine).
>The hardware should display the images, and the software should NOT have to
>worry about them.  (you know what I mean)
>

You're right. OK, everyone delete your SHAM, and Ultra-hires viewing programs!
;^J

>We definitely need drastically improved graphics in the A3000.  That's all I
>can say.

Speaking of amy 3000, any new & improved info on it out there?