Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!van-bc!
From: lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: How about Sliced EHB ??
Message-ID: <857@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca>
Date: 2 Dec 89 14:05:28 GMT
Lines: 31
Return-Path: <lpami!lphillips>
To: van-bc!rnews

In <8912030118.AA15320@en.ecn.purdue.edu>, bevis@EE.ECN.PURDUE.EDU (Jeff Bevis) writes:
>In article <568@h.cs.wvu.wvnet.edu>, dbl@a.cs.wvu.wvnet.edu writes:
>>    Ok, heres an idea (and I hope no one has been posting this to death)
>>how about a sliced Extra Halfbrite display?  If sliced ham can be done
>
>Is it just me, or is anyone else out there getting disturbed by all of the
>dynamic/sliced/diced/minced display modes involving cpu-intesive activity,
>just to bring up the image?

Hear hear!  It is especially irritating when I look at the pictures shown by
these programs, and see that they are usually of lesser quality than those
produced by ASDG's ScanLab, where the work is put into the picture at the time
it is generated, to produce a HAM bitmap with absolutely minimal 'HAMMIES'. One
only need look at 'CF', 'Owleye', or 'Cheryl' to see the truly gorgeous results
of careful generation of an image.

>We definitely need drastically improved graphics in the A3000.  That's all I
>can say.

I'll go along with that.

-larry

--
" All I ask of my body is that it carry around my head."
         - Thomas Alva Edison -
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ 
|   //   Larry Phillips                                                 |
| \X/    lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca -or- uunet!van-bc!lpami!lphillips |
|        COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322  -or-  76703.4322@compuserve.com        |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+