Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ostrich.cis.ohio-state.edu!dyson
From: dyson@ostrich.cis.ohio-state.edu (mark l dyson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
Subject: Re: Mice
Message-ID: <74444@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 28 Nov 89 16:18:34 GMT
References: <89331.232019GAJ103@PSUVM.BITNET>
Sender: news@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Reply-To: mark l dyson <dyson@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Organization: Ohio State University Computer and Information Science
Lines: 15

In article <89331.232019GAJ103@PSUVM.BITNET> GAJ103@PSUVM.BITNET writes:

>...I would like to buy a mouse for my C=64 to use with GEOS
>and CAD programs, but I can't find any reviews of these two mice
>in any of the Commodore magazines.

I can't speak for the M3 mouse, never having seen it.  I can, however,
whole-heartedly indorse the 1351, especially with GEOS.  I spent years using
an old Atari trackball, which now gathers dust.  The 1351 is inexpensive (I 
paid $33.00 for mine) and reliable (so long as you keep the ball clean).  IMHO
the M3 represents an unknown quantity, so I'd go with the 'brand-name' mouse
in this case.  Anybody else?

Peace
-Mark-