Xref: utzoo comp.unix.i386:1486 comp.sys.ibm.pc:39074
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekcrl!tekgvs!keithe
From: keithe@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Which SCSI adapter is better??
Message-ID: <6435@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM>
Date: 30 Nov 89 22:44:41 GMT
References: <21@dynasys.UUCP> <4976@macom1.UUCP>
Reply-To: keithe@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson)
Followup-To: comp.unix.i386
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton,  OR.
Lines: 18

In article <4976@macom1.UUCP> larry@macom1.UUCP (Larry Taborek) writes:
<From article <21@dynasys.UUCP>, by jessea@dynasys.UUCP ( Sysadmin.):
<> 
<> I [want to add SCSI to] an Everex 386/16 and would like
<> this to be compatible with SCO Xenix and AT+T Unix.  I  would also like the
<> ability to add an SCSI tape drive in the future and perhaps another SCSI hard
<> drive as well (2 hard drives AND a tape drive).  Can anyone give me any
<> pointers here?
<
<I just posted a rather long article (72 lines) on how happy I am
<with an Adaptec AHA1542 SCSI controller.
<I just can't say enough good things about this controller.

The only downside being that AT&T nor INTEL are delivering a UNIX that can
use the SCSI controller, Adaptec 1542A or otherwise.  It is, in my opinion,
a serious deficiency in their product offerings.

kEITHe