Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!apple.com!casseres From: casseres@apple.com (David Casseres) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Imagewriter trouble & possible replacement Message-ID: <5571@internal.Apple.COM> Date: 4 Dec 89 19:03:18 GMT Sender: usenet@Apple.COM Organization: Apple Computer, Inc. Lines: 50 References:<5330@internal.Apple.COM> <256CECDD.14888@paris.ics.uci.edu> <5403@internal.Apple.COM> <937@maytag.waterloo.edu> In article <937@maytag.waterloo.edu> jb@aries5.uucp writes: > In article <5403@internal.Apple.COM> casseres@apple.com (David Casseres) writes: > |Just a couple more observations about the ImageWriter. First, in > |spite of all the flaming going on here ("substandard printer" > |etc.) there are a hell of a lot of people out there who say they > |LOVE their ImageWriters. > > Who are they? Where are they? A couple of them have spoken up in this newsgroup. A lot of them send in the customer survey forms that come with Apple products. Some of them are my friends. I didn't invent them out of thin air. > |They are mostly using their IW's the way they were designed to be > |used: as strictly personal, low-load printers, sitting right there > |on your desk and running while you are sitting there -- i.e. no > |remote or unattended operation. > > Is this an official opinion from Apple? No. However, it's a historically correct observation about the design of the ImageWriter. > Are you saying that we should > not be using the ImageWriter as a printer in an educational classroom > environment, where all the students must print their assignments and hand > them in? You apparently missed my first posting in this thread, where I said that it was my _personal_ opinion that an ImageWriter on a network is the punch-line of a joke. Having said that, I'll also say that a hell of a lot of classrooms have exactly that, because it's very cheap, and they have not been so unhappy as to force Apple to create a new product for that environment. > Or does Apple have a high-load printer designed for > remote or unattended operation, that they haven't told anybody about? > (low operation cost is important, buying LaserWriter toner cartridges for > class assignments seems wasteful). The cost of buying reconditioned toner cartridges for a classroom (or multi-classroom) LaserWriter strikes me as a poor reason for dealing with overloaded ImageWriters. I'm no expert on this, but it seems to me the cost of cartridges would be a pretty small item in a school's computer budget. David Casseres Exclaimer: Hey!