Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!walt.cc.utexas.edu!kdp9565 From: kdp9565@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Keith D. Perkins) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: Who will buy the NeXT Keywords: NeXT Message-ID: <21632@ut-emx.UUCP> Date: 30 Nov 89 08:13:35 GMT References: <964@abvax.UUCP> Sender: news@ut-emx.UUCP Reply-To: kdp9565@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Keith D. Perkins) Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas Lines: 39 In article <964@abvax.UUCP> jaz@abvax.UUCP (Jack A. Zucker) writes: >Has anyone bought a system from Businessland or are most of you NeXT users >college students, etc. The Businessland store in Houston has sold some, I've heard. In fact Compaq supposibly bought 10 NeXT's. I've heard it's their policy to buy new machines, but I'm hoping that this means that some company besides IBM is thinking about licensing the NeXTstep. I'm also hoping that when the new NeXT comes out, NeXT corp. will drop the Businessland price of the old model to the $6500 range. About whether the NeXT will sell or not, it depends on a lot of factors. IMHO, the biggest obsticle to overcome is the compatibility problems. If the NeXT had a DOS or MAC window that it could open and run those operating systems programs, it would sell a lot better. It is hard for a company that has sunk some untold tens of thousands of $'s into systems and software to justify buying a computer that has limited compatibility at best with their old systems. There are still a lot of computers out there that are not connected to any form of LAN network, and this means transfering a program or document between two computers still is fastest by way of a floppy disk. The only way currently for the NeXT to transfer files is either by modem or Ethernet, both of which are rather hard ways for an unschooled novice (ie: a secretary) to transfer files. Luckily, Unix, DOS, and the MAC systems are currently in a state of flux. In DOS there is DOS 4.0, Microsoft Windows 3.0, and OS/2. Variations abound depending on the hardware and options added to the OS. The MAC's movement t7.0 is going to be interesting. The movement from Postscript, the necessity of 2MB of RAM, and the changing of the adressing system is going to be a pain for most developers. Unix is in the worst position, though. With everybody and their dog trying to build a GUI, the NeXT has the best chance of winning here. I have yet to read an article that has not praised the NeXT for having an outstanding interface. Unfortunatly, the interface alone won't sell the NeXT, though it might help if it gets licensed out to other companies. > >jaz@calvin.icd.ab.com Keith Perkins The University of Texas at Austin KDP9565@doc.cc.utexas.edu