Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!husc6!bu-cs!dartvax!litle!raistlin
From: raistlin@litle.UUCP (Kevin P. Burke)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.pyramid
Subject: pyramid vs. sequent
Message-ID: <628184596@litle.UUCP>
Date: 27 Nov 89 15:43:16 GMT
Reply-To: raistlin@litle.UUCP (Kevin P. Burke)
Organization: Litle & Co.
Lines: 16
X-News: Phoenix BBS 1.0

our company is in the later stages of deciding on a computer system, and
of our coices, sequent and pyramid look the most promising, what I'd like
to know, is this: why did you/your company/college choose the pyramid, and
if appropriate, why did you chose the pyramid over the sequent?  

please mail the responses to me, and if enough interest is shown, I'll repost
a summarized version of the responses.

If this request is inappropriate for this group, I am sorry, and could you tell
me what would be the appropriate group.  Thank you.
-k
-----
Kevin P. Burke                        |  P.O.B. C26, Hanover NH  03755
{backbone}!dartvax!litle!raistlin     |  Phone: +1 603 795 2157
dartvax.dartmouth.EDU!litle!raistlin  |====================================
raistlin@litle.uucp                   |  Tiger food.   - Hobbes