Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!jtsv16!geac!alias!chk
From: chk@alias.UUCP (C. Harald Koch)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi
Subject: Re: why separate getpwent routines for YP?
Message-ID: <664@alias.UUCP>
Date: 4 Dec 89 17:32:17 GMT
References: <8911301944.AA11476@kailand.kai.com>
Reply-To: chk@alias.UUCP (C. Harald Koch)
Organization: Alias Research, Inc., Toronto, Canada
Lines: 18

In article <8911301944.AA11476@kailand.kai.com> pwolfe@kailand.kai.com (Patrick Wolfe) writes:
>I installed YP (Yellow Pages) on our network this week, and RCS V4.2 commands
>started crashing with segmentation faults.  I found (from the getpwent(3)
>online manpage) that SGI ships two versions of the "getpw*" calls, one that
>understands YP and one that doesn't?  Once I learned this, it was trivial to
>fix the Makefile and recompile, but I can't help wonder why anyone would want
>to ship (and maintain) two separate versions?

This brings up a question I have been meaning to ask: Does SGI compile their
standard UNIX programs with YP support? login works, but it appears that csh
was not compiled with YP; ~user complains "no such user" when that user's
password file entry is a YP reference.

-- 
C. Harald Koch                        Alias Research, Inc., Toronto ON Canada
chk%alias@csri.utoronto.ca      chk@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu      chk@chk.mef.org
"There is no problem, no matter how large or how small, that cannot be solved
 by a suitable application of high explosives."               -Leo Graf, 2298