Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!philmtl!zap!zoom!marc
From: marc@Clik.QC.CA (Marc Boucher)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: Taking risks on software (ISC)
Keywords: unix dos vpix
Message-ID: <894@zoom.Clik.QC.CA>
Date: 29 Nov 89 01:52:14 GMT
References: <240@hdchq.UUCP> <106@gizzmo.UUCP> <[25711bb0:160.7]comp.unix.i386;1@nstar.UUCP>
Reply-To: marc@Clik.QC.CA (Marc Boucher)
Organization: CLIK Telematique Inc., Montreal QC
Lines: 17

In article <[25711bb0:160.7]comp.unix.i386;1@nstar.UUCP> akcs.larry@nstar.UUCP (Larry Snyder) writes:
<>problems with any NEW product. ISC has a very solid product on the market,
<>yet we must expect problems as the product continues to evolve.  If you 
<
<I would disagree.  ISC's product does not work as advertised and with the
<poor documentation I consider it not even in the running in it's current
<stage.  I have suggested that my users invest in a real product such as
<SCO 3.2 - since I know they will get support from real people with a
<professional attitude.  
	I agree. We are using 386/ix here with lost of problems, most of them
regarding their TCP/IP package which is really still beta.. (interlan driver
full of bugs, most utilities don't support /etc/shadow etc.. really silly
stuff that could be easily corrected..)

-- 
Marc Boucher, sys/netadm @ CLIK Telematique Inc - marc@clik.qc.ca
5144668932_home 5149337161_clik 5149332164_fax  - Postmaster@clik.qc.ca