Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!ctisbv!m380!pim
From: pim@cti-software.nl (Pim Zandbergen)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: Which SCSI adapter is better??
Message-ID: <1989Dec2.045114.762@cti-software.nl>
Date: 2 Dec 89 04:51:14 GMT
References: <21@dynasys.UUCP> <4976@macom1.UUCP> <6435@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM>
Organization: CTI Software BV, The Hague, The Netherlands
Lines: 13

keithe@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson) writes:

>The only downside being that AT&T nor INTEL are delivering a UNIX that can
>use the SCSI controller, Adaptec 1542A or otherwise.  It is, in my opinion,
>a serious deficiency in their product offerings.

AT&T offer a UNIX that supports the Western Digital FASST
SCSI host adaptor.
-- 
Pim Zandbergen                             domain : pim@cti-software.nl
CTI Software BV                            uucp   : uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!ctisbv!pim
Laan Copes van Cattenburch 70              phone  : +31 70 542302
2585 GD The Hague, The Netherlands         fax    : +31 70 512837