Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!aplcen!haven!adm!xadmx!AGRISCS@umcvmb.missouri.edu
From: AGRISCS@umcvmb.missouri.edu (Don Ingli)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: FCC doing it again...
Message-ID: <21536@adm.BRL.MIL>
Date: 27 Nov 89 18:30:33 GMT
Sender: news@adm.BRL.MIL
Lines: 58

I got this note from another list I am subscribed to.  Let me pass this on
in hopes that someone has better info and maybe we all (as individuals)
should send a letter...

-------
Received: from UMRVMB.BITNET by UMCVMB.BITNET (Mailer R2.04) with BSMTP id
 0378; Sun, 26 Nov 89 16:44:14 CST
Received: by UMRVMB (Mailer R2.05) id 3657; Sun, 26 Nov 89 16:44:49 CST
Date:         Sun, 26 Nov 89 17:34:00 EDT
Reply-To:     "MAPLE::LAK8141" <lak8141%maple.decnet@PINE.CIRCA.UFL.EDU>
Sender:       COCO - Tandy Color Computer List <COCO@PUCC>
From:         "MAPLE::LAK8141" <lak8141%maple.decnet@PINE.CIRCA.UFL.EDU>
Subject:      This is a possible response to the proposal to charge 6 bucks for
              ALL modem calls
X-To:         coco <coco@pucc.princeton.edu>
To:           Don Ingli <AGRISCS@UMCVMB.BITNET>

Title: Re:Charge more for modems?
   To: All
 From: Cynic (71)
 Date: Sun Nov 26 09:58:20 1989

To:

Chairman of the FCC 1919 M Street N.W. Washington, D.C. 20554

Chairman, Senate Communication Subcommittee SH-227 Hart Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
                                                                     Chairman,
House Telecommunication Subcommittee B-331 Rayburn
Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Please allow me to express my displeasure with the FCC proposal
which would authorize a surcharge for the use of modems on the
telephone network. This regulation is nothing less than an
attempt to restrict the free exchange of information among the
growing number of computer users. Calls placed using modems
require no special telephone company equipment, and users of
modems pay the phone company for use of the network in the form
of a monthly bill. In short a modem call is the same as a voice
call, and should not be subject to any additional charges.

-----

What do you all think???


+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+
|  DON INGLI                                                           |
|  UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE |
|  WORK: (314) 875-5344      FAX: (314) 875-5335                       |
|                                                                      |
| bitnet: agriscs@umcvmb.bitnet  internet: agriscs@umcvmb.missouri.edu |
| attmail: attmail!attbl!arpa!umcvmb.missouri.edu!agriscs              |
|                                                                      |
| ALL OPINIONS IN THIS NOTE ARE OF MY OWN AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE     |
| FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OR THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA            |
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+