Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!earlw
From: earlw@Apple.COM (Earl Wallace)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Re^2: FCC doing it again...
Message-ID: <5476@internal.Apple.COM>
Date: 29 Nov 89 00:48:13 GMT
References: <1989Nov28.011514.4193@virtech.uucp> <246@cfa.HARVARD.EDU> <5464@internal.Apple.COM> <34661@cornell.UUCP>
Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA
Lines: 10

In article <34661@cornell.UUCP> murthy@alsvid.cs.cornell.edu (Chet Murthy) writes:
>...
>Read the article more carefully.  And think.  The Post Office charges less
>for bulk mail because it's not much more costly to do the routing of
>a large package than it is for a small package.  The major cost is the
>human one - handling.  So it makes sense to charge less per lb. for bulk
>than for letters.
>...

Hummm... I think you missed the ':-)' somehow....