Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!rutgers!att!cbnews!res From: res@cbnews.ATT.COM (Robert E. Stampfli) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: FCC doing it again... Message-ID: <11818@cbnews.ATT.COM> Date: 30 Nov 89 00:22:33 GMT References: <128505@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> Reply-To: res@cbnews.ATT.COM (Robert E. Stampfli,55216,cb,1C315,6148604268) Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 29 >What does this lecture have to do with modems? Simply >this: a user of a modem is perturbing the traffic patterns >in a big way. The number of calls made are probably about >the same, but the holding time of a call is now orders of >magnitude more than the average projected holding time. No. I have a phone line with a modem connected to it. I receive 5-6 calls per day and the average holding time is probably in the 1-2 minute range. The point I am trying to make is this: although statistically modem lines may have a longer holding time than voice lines, to base a rate on this fact would be as ludicrous as, say, charging psychiatrists more for a line than opthalmologists because statistics say they talk more. In fact, just about anyone with a monitored burglar alarm would be similarly affected, and you don't seriously believe burglar alarm modems tie up central office equipment significantly (Mind you, I am not talking about their effect on police lines here). No, if this is really an issue that is causing BOC executives to pull out their hair, they should attempt to solve the problem directly: get their Utilities Commission to allow them to to institute time/distance charging. If there is an unlimited-use provision in the tarriffs, I think it is only reasonable to expect high usage customers take to advantage of it, and this is just as valid an option for the modem user as for the family with 3 teenagers. To try to discriminate based on the use of a modem is possible because those supporting such maneuvers realize it would be a public relations disaster to try to resolve the problem the straight-forward way. There are more equitable solutions, though, and these should be the ones pursued if this is really a problem. -- Rob Stampfli / att.com!stampfli (uucp@work) / kd8wk@w8cqk (packet radio) 614-864-9377 / osu-cis.cis.ohio-state.edu!kd8wk!res (uucp@home)