Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!ge-dab!peora!tarpit!bilver!bill From: bill@bilver.UUCP (Bill Vermillion) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: FCC doing it again... Message-ID: <385@bilver.UUCP> Date: 2 Dec 89 16:45:17 GMT References: <21536@adm.BRL.MIL-> Reply-To: bill@bilver.UUCP (Bill Vermillion) Organization: W. J. Vermillion, Winter Park, FL Lines: 35 In article <21536@adm.BRL.MIL-> AGRISCS@umcvmb.missouri.edu (Don Ingli) writes: ->I got this note from another list I am subscribed to. Let me pass this on ->in hopes that someone has better info and maybe we all (as individuals) ->should send a letter... ..... (Header deleted - all pertinent text included - wjv) ->Please allow me to express my displeasure with the FCC proposal ->which would authorize a surcharge for the use of modems on the ->telephone network. This regulation is nothing less than an ->attempt to restrict the free exchange of information among the ->growing number of computer users. Calls placed using modems ->require no special telephone company equipment, and users of ->modems pay the phone company for use of the network in the form ->of a monthly bill. In short a modem call is the same as a voice ->call, and should not be subject to any additional charges. -> -> ->What do you all think??? Well of course the phone company argument is that it ties up lines longer, etc,, etc , etc .... Singling out a subset of a group isn't fair (IMHO) and computer modem users are just a subset of all modem users, since a FAX machine contains a modem. The proposal should consider all devices containing modems. Then everyone who owns a FAX will get involved, and should spell defeat for the proposal. If computer modems only are affected I would suspect there would be grounds for a suit of some sort. Hey - how about a surcharge for slow modems, and let us with high speeds (9600) go free. After all we don't use the lines nearly as much :-) :-) :-) -- Bill Vermillion - UUCP: {uiucuxc,hoptoad,petsd}!peora!tarpit!bilver!bill : bill@bilver.UUCP