Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!crdgw1!sungod!davidsen
From: davidsen@sungod.crd.ge.com (William Davidsen)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: Xenix 386-AT vs. 386-GT
Message-ID: <4069@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>
Date: 1 Dec 89 18:22:37 GMT
References: <3399@cbnewsd.ATT.COM> <119@embassy.UUCP>
Sender: news@crdgw1.crd.ge.com
Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Distribution: usa
Organization: General Electric Corp. R&D, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 11

In article <119@embassy.UUCP> lance@embassy.UUCP (Lance N. Antrim) writes:
|                                            I don't know what has
| happened since then, but it seems strange to confuse the product line
| with both the AT and GT versions.  Does anyone know if the AT version is
| (or has been) dropped?

  The AT version dropped? I suspect that SCO sells about an order of
magnitude more AT versions than the GT.
	bill davidsen		(davidsen@crdos1.crd.GE.COM)
  {uunet | philabs}!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me