Xref: utzoo news.admin:7840 news.groups:15220 Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!uwm.edu!psuvax1!rutgers!att!cbnews!wbt From: wbt@cbnews.ATT.COM (William B. Thacker) Newsgroups: news.admin,news.groups Subject: Re: Fixing the unbroken Message-ID: <11832@cbnews.ATT.COM> Date: 30 Nov 89 14:34:01 GMT References: <7139@ficc.uu.net> Reply-To: wbt@cbnews.ATT.COM (William B. Thacker,00440,cb,1D211,6148604019) Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 39 In article <7139@ficc.uu.net> jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell) writes: >All of the proposals for new voting schemes -- and they seem >to be getting hairier by the moment -- ignore one fact: >the status quo works pretty well. An occasional abuse, >like con.aquaria, does happen, but I'd hate to see the >current nature of the net abandoned in an overly-zealous >reach to stamp out all possible problems. Hear ! Hear ! Is anyone else tempted to draw an analogy to the War on Drugs ? "These are flames. These are the Usenet guidelines on flames. Any questions ?" Let's consider the actual cost of the sci.aquaria debate: 1) Bandwidth. For the month and a half involved, the volume in news.groups averaged well over 50 articles a day; some days, over 100. Most of this was redundant, and much of it was flaming. 2) Personal. The honor and motives of numerous posters has been publically tainted, either by word or deed. I daresay that most of them would rather have been having a root canal than put up with the harassment. 3) Net.structure. We now have alt.aquaria (some places), sci.aquaria (some places), rec.pets.fish (some places), and a vote is in progress for rec.aquaria, which will pass and be everywhere. And I wouldn't be surprised to find comp.birds.cockatoos out there somewhere. Was it worth it ? What was gained ? - - - - - - - - valuable coupon - - - - - - - clip and save - - - - - - - - Bill Thacker AT&T Network Systems - Columbus wbt@cbnews.att.com Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com