Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!tale
From: tale@cs.rpi.edu (Dave Lawrence)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Another forgery
Message-ID: <25762E3C.622@rpi.edu>
Date: 1 Dec 89 07:54:35 GMT
References: <8023@ficc.uu.net> <4V.ZZG@splut.conmicro.com>
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Lines: 17

In <4V.ZZG@splut.conmicro.com> jay@splut.conmicro.com (Jay Maynard) writes:

   It says something about the Richard Sexton Sycophants that they have to
   stoop to this level to discredit Peter; that must mean that they have
   given up on their feeble arguments.

I certainly don't approve of the forgery, but I don't think this is
right either.  There is no evidence that this was done by any Richard
Sexton Sycophant.  It could just have easily been done by a Richard
Sexton Basher in an attempt to further discredit the proponents of
sci.aquaria by causing people to leap to the above cited conclusion.

Dave
-- 
   (setq mail '("tale@cs.rpi.edu" "tale@ai.mit.edu" "tale@rpitsmts.bitnet"))
"... the broader subject of usenet customs and other bizarre social phenomena."
                                   -- Phil Agre <agre@gargoyle.uchicago.edu>


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com