Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!GAFFA.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
From: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: (none)
Message-ID: <8911291217.AA02465@mcvax.cwi.nl>
Date: 29 Nov 89 14:08:00 GMT
Sender: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: Love-Hounds@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 70
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu

Really-From: NEWSMGR@KONTU.UTU.FI

Relay-Version: VMS News - V5.9 09/07/89 VAX/VMS V5.1; site kontu.utu.fi
Path: kontu!utu.fi!tut!sunic!mcsun!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!brutus.c
   s.uiuc.edu!apple!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!GAFFA.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: (none)
Message-ID: <8911290959.AA01152@mcvax.cwi.nl>
From: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Date: 29 Nov 89 11:56:00 GMT
Reply-To: Love-Hounds@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Sender: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu
Lines: 54

Really-From: NEWSMGR@KONTU.UTU.FI

Relay-Version: VMS News - V5.9 09/07/89 VAX/VMS V5.1; site kontu.utu.fi
Path: kontu!utu.fi!tut!sunic!mcsun!uunet!wuarchive!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beaco
   n!GAFFA.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: (none)
Message-ID: <8911290819.AA00261@pyramid.pyramid.com>
From: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Date: 29 Nov 89 08:19:09 GMT
Reply-To: Love-Hounds@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Sender: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu
Lines: 38

Really-From: uucp@pyramid.pyramid.com (Pyramid UUCP Manager)

I've also tumbled. And my SO's last two "outside men" have been
Path: pyramid!cbmvax!amix!ag
From: ag@amix.commodore.com (Keith Gabryelski)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: Oppenheimer and Kate
Message-ID: <130@amix.commodore.com>
Date: 29 Nov 89 04:47:05 GMT
References: <3923@scolex.sco.COM>
Reply-To: ag@amix.commodore.com (Keith Gabryelski)
Organization: Commodore Amix Development
Lines: 23


In article <3923@scolex.sco.COM>  tracyr@uunet.uu.net (jane smallberries)
writes:
>It was my understanding that Oppenheimer was sort of forced
>into the position of project lead for the bomb, due to his
>scientific prowess.  I thought that he resisted the whole time,
>and was even criticized (and later removed from the project
>lead position) for not wanting to drop the bomb in a populated
>area.  In other words, I thought he was a good guy at heart,
>who was rather unwilling much of the time.  Yet Kate (or her
>friend) implied he was Evil Incarnate.

It is my understanding the Oppenheimer liked the job and although did
not want the distructive part of it, took it with the technology part
(which is what really appealed to him).

He was dismissed from the job because of prejudices against Germans at
the time.

This from the book "Who's got Einsteins office?" by SomeGuy.

Pax, Keith
--
ag@amix.commodore.com        Keith Gabryelski          ...!cbmvax!amix!ag