Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!usc!wuarchive!psuvax1!psuvm!bhb3
From: BHB3@PSUVM.BITNET
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: Radar Detectors
Message-ID: <89335.114239BHB3@PSUVM.BITNET>
Date: 1 Dec 89 16:42:39 GMT
References: <32554@buckaroo.mips.COM>
Organization: Penn State University
Lines: 19

In article <32554@buckaroo.mips.COM>, vaso@mips.COM (Vaso Bovan) says:
>
>Continuing my education on radar detectors now that I've wised up to
>the necessity:
>
>Is it prudent to hold out for an X, K, & Ka detector, rather than buy
>just an X & K detector ?
>
>How do remotes (behind the grille) compare to visor models ?


There have been ad naseum posts in rec.autos on radar detetcors of all sorts
and types in rec.autos.  The Ka detection is kind of useless to summarize
since it is only used in photo radar installation and by the time it goes
of it is too late to slow down.  The Ka detection would be of use in
some kind of clever countermeasure device perhaps, but not in the usual
way a detector is used.

                                                Brent H. besler


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com