Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!henry.jpl.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!aero!era1987@violet.Berkeley.EDU From: era1987@violet.Berkeley.EDU Newsgroups: soc.feminism Subject: Re: Identifying the "different" (was Re: ... change the language? Message-ID: <1989Nov25.073938.18484@agate.berkeley.edu> Date: 25 Nov 89 07:39:38 GMT References: <47469@bbn.COM> <1329@uvaarpa.virginia.edu> <1989Nov7.065815.22895@agate.berkeley.edu> <1420@uvaarpa.virginia.edu> Sender: nadel@aerospace.aero.org Reply-To: era1987@violet.Berkeley.EDU (Mark Ethan Smith) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 39 Approved: nadel@aerospace.aero.org Status: R In article <1420@uvaarpa.virginia.edu> hb@Virginia.EDU (Hank Bovis) writes: >Although I agree 100% with your observations here, Mark, I have some >problems with the prescriptions for remedying discrimination that >seem to be suggested. Specifically, the implication here seems to be >that the only way to truly end discrimination is to eliminate readily >visible diffferences between affected classes and non-affected classes. >Nonetheless, I sincerely hope that this is not the _only_ way to solve >the gender discrimination problem, because it it is, then by analogy, >the race discrimination problem becomes intractable. I suppose we >could all camouflage our faces in some way, but I think that would be >a rather high price to pay. Yes, it would be a high price. Freedom and equality don't come cheap. But eliminating racism would not require people to hide their faces. You see, Hank, sexism exists among almost all shades of people. And in almost all shades, women occupy lower status than men and men therefore often consider women to be their property. By eliminating those visible distinctions that mark women as property and thereby raising the status of women, you leave people with much less ability and justification to own women and control their lives. There would then probably be a lot more intermarriages. I personally know of many cases where Caucasian women experienced sexism and therefore felt a kinship with minority men who had experienced discrimination, and preferred to marry somebody who was more apt to treat them as an equal and with whom they could unite against a common enemy. The highest status group in our society isn't just men, Hank, it is white men. Eliminating racism won't eliminate sexism, but eliminating sexism will be a major step towards eliminating racism. >....preserve the differences >but eliminate the gender-based correlations, so that everyone, female >and male, would have the freedom to dress or act according to the >situation rather than their gender. Amen. --Mark Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com