Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!daemon From: cks@white.toronto.edu (Chris Siebenmann) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: X-terms v. PCs v. Workstations Summary: The bottleneck is hard thinking... Message-ID: <89Dec5.151758est.27219@snow.white.toronto.edu> Date: 5 Dec 89 20:19:25 GMT References: <1498@aber-cs.UUCP> Sender: Organization: Ziebmef home away from home Lines: 33 pcg@cs.aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi) writes: ... | The net result is that people like the many contributors to this newgroup | work very hard to squeeze performance out of state-of-the-art technology by | devising clever architectures, but the single greatest problem users have as | to performance out there is that system administration is a difficult task, | and nearly nobody does it properly, whether the system is centralized or | distributed. The tipical system administrator tipically does not understand | the performance profiles of machines, much less of systems or networks, and | does not have a clue as to what to do to make the wonder toys run, except to | ask for more kit. Does anyone? This isn't an idle question; I'm not aware of any papers or studies on the disk access patterns of modern workstation-oriented environments. All the disk access pattern studies I know of are several years old, and done on old-style centralized machines that everyone talked to via a dumb terminal. No one has really studied a workstation plus file server environment, or an x-terminal and compute server one. We're working on it here, and already have gotten some surprising numbers (well, surprising to me!). If people are aware of such performance summaries, please send me email with detail. In the absence of such studies, I think it's very hard to come up with accurate speculation (it's also worth noting that we currently have very bad tools for the average sysadmin to find and cure performance bottlenecks; tuning a distributed system still involves a lot of guesswork and experience). -- "I shall clasp my hands together and bow to the corners of the world." Number Ten Ox, "Bridge of Birds" Chris Siebenmann ...!utgpu!{ncrcan,ontmoh!moore}!ziebmef!cks cks@white.toronto.edu or ...!utgpu!{,csri!}cks