Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!novavax!twwells!bill
From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: LEX rule, anyone???
Message-ID: <1989Dec9.145708.2332@twwells.com>
Date: 9 Dec 89 14:57:08 GMT
References: <601@vice2utc.chalmers.se> <224@bohra.cpg.oz> <1989Dec7.193738.9829@twwells.com> <21182@mimsy.umd.edu>
Organization: None, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Lines: 11

In article <21182@mimsy.umd.edu> chris@mimsy.umd.edu (Chris Torek) writes:
: At any rate, perhaps what Bill Wells is remembering is lex taking
: something that it apparently should not have because it was in some
: state other than INITIAL.  Or it could be yet another lex bug....

I'll argue for the bug. Simply switching to flex made the problem
go away.

---
Bill                    { uunet | novavax | ankh | sunvice } !twwells!bill
bill@twwells.com