Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!shelby!eos!ptolemy!raymond
From: raymond@ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov (Eric A. Raymond)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: TurboC 2.0 Prof vs uSoft C 5.1
Message-ID: <3186@einstein.ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov>
Date: 11 Dec 89 21:27:01 GMT
References: <24846@cup.portal.com>
Reply-To: raymond@einstein.arc.nasa.gov.UUCP (Eric A. Raymond)
Distribution: na
Organization: NASA Ames Research Center
Lines: 11

In article <24846@cup.portal.com> Scott_A_Dalrymple@cup.portal.com writes:
>I'm not interested in Quick C or TC (not professional) 
>because I demand a top notch debugger.

TC (std) includes an excellent debugger in it's integrated
environment. TC professional adds a standalone debugger and an
assembler. I only use the standalone debugger when my program is too
large to run under the integrated environment.
-- 
Eric A. Raymond  (raymond@ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov)
G7 C7 G7 G#7 G7 G+13 C7 GM7 Am7 Bm7 Bd7 Am7 C7 Do13 G7 C7 G7 D+13: Elmore James