Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!stc!datlog!scm
From: scm@dlcq15.datlog.co.uk (Steve Mawer)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: A question of style
Message-ID: <1989Dec11.125217.16923@dlcq15.datlog.co.uk>
Date: 11 Dec 89 12:52:17 GMT
References: <547@mars.Morgan.COM> <1989Nov30.001947.14883@aqdata.uucp> <427@jhereg.Minnetech.MN.ORG> <565@s5.Morgan.COM> <1989Dec4.032918.16550@twwells.com>
Reply-To: scm@dlcq15.datlog.co.uk (Steve Mawer)
Organization: Data Logic Ltd, Queens House, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 1YR
Lines: 13

In article <1989Dec4.032918.16550@twwells.com> bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) writes:
>The primary error that the comma operator leads to, when used in
>the for statement, is the including of things which are not part
>of the control structure itself, moving the controlled statements
>into the for, and thus presenting the reader with several ideas
>crammed into the one statement.

You mean it's *not* a sign of a poor C programmer to put more than a
single semicolon in the body of a for loop?  :-)

--
Steve C. Mawer        <scm@datlog.co.uk> or < {backbone}!ukc!datlog!scm >
                       Voice:  +44 1 863 0383 (x2153)