Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxe.cso.uiuc.edu!hirchert
From: hirchert@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: EQUIVALENCE, COMPUTED GO TO in FORT
Message-ID: <50500170@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 9 Dec 89 01:38:54 GMT
References: <143@suntc.UUCP>
Lines: 8
Nf-ID: #R:suntc.UUCP:143:uxe.cso.uiuc.edu:50500170:000:331
Nf-From: uxe.cso.uiuc.edu!hirchert    Dec  8 08:25:00 1989


Walt Brainerd (brainerd@unmvax.unm.edu) writes:
>Computed GO TO is on a list of a few noncontroversial things
>with the property that they could be considered for removal
>from the next standard (2001?) after the one coming up.

No, computed GO TO is not on the "obsolescent features" list.  Only
_assigned_ GO TO is on that list.