Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!shelby!ASYLUM.SF.CA.US!karl
From: karl@ASYLUM.SF.CA.US (Karl Auerbach)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kerberos
Subject: kerberos and ISO protocol standards
Message-ID: <8912130944.AA01737@asylum.sf.ca.us>
Date: 13 Dec 89 17:44:33 GMT
References: <8912110931.AA04275@rcole.hpl.hp.com>
Sender: daemon@shelby.Stanford.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 8

> Thus it is not possible to 'standardise' kerberos, nor really possible
> to specify its use in a standard.

???? Has the "standards" process reached the point where existing work
is not elegible?  Rather a "standard" must be new?  Is somebody
suffering from not-invented-here syndrome?

					--karl--