Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ucsd!rutgers!bellcore!att!cbnewsl!ry
From: ry@cbnewsl.ATT.COM (ryerson.schwark)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: SURVEY - Documentation: Binders Or No Binders
Keywords: To Binder or not, that is the question
Message-ID: <3179@cbnewsl.ATT.COM>
Date: 5 Dec 89 19:03:50 GMT
References: <3178@cbnewsl.ATT.COM>
Reply-To: ry@cbnewsl.ATT.COM (ryerson.schwark,sf,)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 13

In article <3178@cbnewsl.ATT.COM> coco@ihlpy.att.com writes:
>	Binders please!!!!  8^)
>	Especially if they come in boxes like the ones made by AT&T!!!


I think most people would agree that binders are preferable all things
being equal, but they aren't.  Binders are much more expensive to print
than perfect bound.  A more useful question is:  How much more would you
pay to get a binder instead of a perfect bound book?


Ry Schwark
rye@attunix.att.com