Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!rutgers!mit-eddie!mit-amt!snorkelwacker!ira.uka.de!smurf!ccave!root
From: root@ccave.UUCP (Juergen Hermann)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: VoRecOne really works! (or should I say listens....)
Message-ID: <87@ccave.UUCP>
Date: 5 Dec 89 02:27:04 GMT
References: <2184.AA2184@amigash>
Reply-To: root@ccave.UUCP (Juergen Hermann)
Organization: Chameleon's Cave [JDCP 0.96]
Lines: 23

In article <2184.AA2184@amigash> scot@amigash.UUCP (Scot L. Harris) writes:
>figured I would give you my initial impressions after about 3 days
>of playing with it.

Your report was very interesting, and I have a few questions:

Could you please inform us of your impressions when you played with it
for more than 3 days? :-)  If you're as enthusiastic after 3 weeks, I
might consider to buy it.

And please post the full address of the company that produces this thing.
And prices, if you have them.

>	The hit rate on it appears to be pretty good.  I would estimate that it
>gets the correct word about 75  to 90% of the time.  I expect this will

Is this the rate (75 to 90%) for not recognizing a word at all, or the
rate for getting a wrong word from the list, or both? How often does it
misinterpret words when the list of words is *long*.

--
   //  Juergen Hermann		root@ccave.smurf.ira.uka.de
 \X/   75 Karlsruhe 1, FRG	Fido: 2:241/2.1212@FidoNet