Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!samsung!emory!hubcap!ncrcae!sauron!stevem
From: stevem@sauron.Columbia.NCR.COM (Steve McClure)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: ST/Amiga Emulation (contd)
Message-ID: <1834@sauron.Columbia.NCR.COM>
Date: 6 Dec 89 21:53:05 GMT
References: <2205@leah.Albany.Edu> <+K_|C%@rpi.edu> <2240@leah.Albany.Edu>
Reply-To: stevem@sauron.UUCP (Steve McClure)
Distribution: na
Organization: E&M-Columbia, NCR Corp, W Columbia, SC
Lines: 24

In article <2240@leah.Albany.Edu> jac423@leah.Albany.Edu (Jules Cisek) writes:
>In article <+K_|C%@rpi.edu>, kudla@pawl.rpi.edu (Robert J. Kudla) writes:
[ how much MIDI stuff is available for platforms deleted ]
>
>Just  give  me  a  break.  All  I  want  is  just to see more MIDI Amiga
>software. There isn't enough of it. I know, because I use it every  day.
>Please,  I  don't  want to hear any more. I want to generate interest in
>more MIDI software and you and that Chuck dude just keep getting  on  my
>case.  If  you  really want, I'll post the list of ST MIDI software from
>Electronic Musician (It's really, really long) and you can sit there and
>try to prove to me that the Amiga has a comparable amount.

Does it really matter how much MIDI software there is?  Shouldn't the quality
and abilities of the available software be the important factor here.
This argument does just apply to MIDI software but all software.

How many C compilers do you need?  The two for the amiga seem to be as good
as the multitudes on other platforms.

Steve
-----
stevem@Columbia.NCR.COM
The above are my opinions, which NCR doesn't really care about anyway!
CAUSER's Amiga BBS! | 803-796-3127 | 8pm-8am 8n1 | 300/1200/2400