Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cbmvax!heimat!sneakers
From: sneakers@heimat.UUCP (Dan "Sneakers" Schein)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Aztec and Lattice. Do they suck?
Message-ID: <10112.AA10112@heimat>
Date: 2 Dec 89 04:26:32 GMT
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga
Organization: Sneakers Computing
Lines: 26

In Message <6060@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu>, kuan@iris.ucdavis.edu (Francisco Kuan) writes:

>Isn't it funny that the two best c-compilers on the Amiga are
>considered to be mediocre (perhaps that's being generous) on IBM's?
>When's the last time you heard anyone develop something on an IBM
>using Lattice? 

  Hold on just one minute! True early versions of Lattice for MS-DOS
  were not the best in the market. But their newest version has come a
  long way. My present employer and I use V4.x of Lattice for MS-DOS
  and its a great product. We develope software for the airline industry
  and to me thats a serious business. V4.x has the same editor and 
  debugger like the Amiga version plus more. Not to mention the adds ive
  seen for V6.0 present a product that should put Lattice on the top of
  the MS-DOS compiler pile.

  Sneakers

--
                                      ___
    Dan "Sneakers" Schein            ////           BERKS AMIGA BBS
    Sneakers Computing              ////    You've tried the rest,  now try
    2455 McKinley Ave.      ___    ////     the BEST! 80 Megs of 100% AMIGA
    West Lawn, PA 19609     \\\\  ////           24 hrs @  215/678-7691
                             \\\\////
    {pyramid|rutgers|uunet}!cbmvax!heimat!sneakers